Screen Shot 2014-09-21 at 12.51.29 AM

Kay Hagan and 14 other senators who support Amnesty can be Voted Out of office in November

68 U.S. senators (click here to see who) that are in office to defend our country, Constitution, and laws officially voted to reward illegal aliens with amnesty.

You may wonder whether they are corrupt or dangerously incompetent. Who cares? The only sure thing is that these men and women are not fit to serve the people.

Thank goodness there is some good news. Five of these morons are retiring [Baucus (MO), Harkin (IA), Johnson (SD), Levin (MI), and Rockefeller (WV)] Even better, your chance to replace many others with real statesmen (or stateswomen) will occur in less than 7 weeks.

Here is a list of the senators who voted for amnesty and are up for reelection:

  1. Begich (AK) out in 2014
  2. Pryor (AR) out in 2014
  3. Udall (CO) out in 2014
  4. Coons (DE) out in 2014
  5. Durbin (IL) out in 2014
  6. Landrieu (LA) out in 2014
  7. Cowan (MA) out in 2014
  8. Franken (MN) out in 2014
  9. Hagan (NC) out in 2014
  10. Shaheen (NH) out in 2014
  11. Udall (NM) out in 2014
  12. Graham (SC) out in 2014
  13. Merkley (OR) out in 2014
  14. Reed (RI) out in 2014
  15. Warner (VA) out in 2014
Time to replace us!

Time to replace us!

What to do next?

Step 1: Register to vote, if you haven’t already. You can get started by clicking this link:  http://votesmart.org/elections/voter-registration#.U8nx_43qc08

Step 2:  Vote in November and send these unfit public servants packing. We cannot afford to have them voting on our future.

flag-animation_6460_1

Why Not Vote for Democrats or Republicans? The Past and the Future

In 2013, Gallup released a poll about Americans’ political affiliations, showing a record number of voters identifying as Independents.

 

1988

2000

2008

2013

Democrats

36%

32%

37%

31%

Independents

31%

36%

36%

42%

Republicans

33%

31%

27%

25%

 

Though polls should be taken with a grain of salt, this one is fairly reliable, thanks to a large sample and 1% margin of error. And it has major implications for 2014 and 2016 elections. The parties’ reactions were:

  • Democrats reacted with glee that the Republicans have their lowest numbers since 1988.
  • Republicans gloated that the Democrats’ numbers plummeted under Obama.
  • Everyone moved on, tra-la-la, with no thought to the larger implications of the data.

Gallup’s takeaway: “The rise in political independence is likely an outgrowth of Americans’ record or near-record negative views of the two major U.S. parties, of Congress, and their low level of trust in government more generally.”

Both parties consider Independents as up-for-grabs, because Independents rarely vote for Independent candidates, though it would benefit everyone if we did. Let’s look at what the past taught the two parties and where they’re headed for 2016.

 

Continue reading

Nancy Pelosi clarifies: It’s the War on Stupid Women

The War on Women messaging really bugs me. It’s such elementary, over-the-top propaganda that I always turn on the Democrat spewing it, rather than the Republican it’s aimed at. Do they really think women are that dumb?

Don’t get me wrong. I’m fully aware of the flaws of the Republican party. Yet, on the other hand, they aren’t treating me like a drooling imbecile, so that’s one up on the Democrats.

Thought not included since no politician has told me what to think yet.

Thought not included since no one has told me what to think yet.

Paraphrased, the War on Women message is: “You women better back Democrats and our agenda. If you do, you can have your birth control and almost equal pay. If you don’t, Republicans will show up – probably with guns – to make sure you clean the house all day and that your sexist husband beats you every evening. The Republicans will only give you one holiday from this routine every nine months, specifically to give birth, but we Democrats will throw in an extra holiday every election day, so you can vote for us!” Mmm-mmm. You sure know how to win a girl over!

Check out this video of Nancy Pelosi, in which she first suggests that women are too dim to realize an election is happening (probably because we’re unlikely to know how to read the news), then follows it up by saying that only with Democrats ruling the roost, can we expect the world as we know it to continue. Spoiler alert: She doesn’t answer the question of why a world filled with such ignorant women should continue to exist.

 

Well, fiddle-dee-dee. I may not see the logic of why I have to rely on the Democrats or Republicans to defend my liberty, but that’s probably because, being a woman, I’m better suited for vacuuming than thinking. Thanks for explaining it to me, Nancy Pelosi!